Player Ranking
Week of 2026/08/24 – 2026/08/30 (UTC)
5,785 players
Updated 2026/10/11 23:00 UTC
| Rank | Rank change |
Player
|
Rating | Rating change | RD | Win–Loss | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 398 | ↓14 | 1987 | ↓4 | 85 | 102–52 | 66.2% | |
| 398 | ↓1 | 1987 | ↑2 | 104 | 86–40 | 68.3% | |
| 403 | ↓6 | 1985 | → | 115 | 40–17 | 70.2% | |
| 403 | ↓6 | 1985 | → | 65 | 517–311 | 62.4% | |
| 403 | ↓6 | 1985 | → | 101 | 76–40 | 65.5% | |
| 403 | ↓6 | 1985 | → | 111 | 15–6 | 71.4% | |
| 407 | ↓4 | 1984 | → | 111 | 132–59 | 69.1% | |
| 407 | ↓4 | 1984 | → | 99 | 53–26 | 67.1% | |
| 407 | ↓4 | 1984 | → | 135 | 21–11 | 65.6% | |
| 407 | ↑35 | 1984 | ↑15 | 76 | 285–153 | 65.1% | |
| 407 | ↓4 | 1984 | → | 101 | 26–12 | 68.4% | |
| 412 | ↓5 | 1983 | → | 98 | 54–29 | 65.1% | |
| 413 | ↑117 | 1982 | ↑34 | 88 | 230–76 | 75.2% | |
| 413 | ↓4 | 1982 | → | 81 | 390–247 | 61.2% | |
| 413 | ↑127 | 1982 | ↑36 | 67 | 47–19 | 71.2% | |
| 416 | ↑252 | 1981 | ↑65 | 77 | 208–91 | 69.6% | |
| 416 | ↓6 | 1981 | → | 118 | 116–48 | 70.7% | |
| 416 | ↓38 | 1981 | ↓12 | 90 | 85–46 | 64.9% | |
| 416 | ↓6 | 1981 | → | 95 | 184–159 | 53.6% | |
| 416 | ↑400 | 1981 | ↑98 | 87 | 38–22 | 63.3% | |
| 416 | ↓6 | 1981 | → | 108 | 68–33 | 67.3% | |
| 422 | ↓7 | 1980 | → | 123 | 232–68 | 77.3% | |
| 422 | ↓7 | 1980 | → | 80 | 120–63 | 65.6% | |
| 422 | ↓62 | 1980 | ↓21 | 71 | 245–113 | 68.4% | |
| 425 | ↓5 | 1979 | → | 139 | 49–14 | 77.8% | |
| 425 | ↓74 | 1979 | ↓25 | 77 | 175–63 | 73.5% | |
| 425 | ↓5 | 1979 | → | 115 | 20–10 | 66.7% | |
| 428 | ↓6 | 1978 | → | 86 | 209–91 | 69.7% | |
| 428 | ↓6 | 1978 | → | 127 | 53–26 | 67.1% | |
| 430 | ↓20 | 1977 | ↓4 | 80 | 100–58 | 63.3% | |
| 430 | ↓92 | 1977 | ↓31 | 84 | 94–39 | 70.7% | |
| 432 | ↑10 | 1976 | ↑7 | 93 | 69–29 | 70.4% | |
| 433 | ↓7 | 1975 | → | 103 | 82–48 | 63.1% | |
| 433 | ↓7 | 1975 | → | 145 | 30–11 | 73.2% | |
| 433 | ↓7 | 1975 | → | 141 | 69–52 | 57.0% | |
| 433 | ↑17 | 1975 | ↑9 | 106 | 46–17 | 73.0% | |
| 437 | ↓7 | 1974 | → | 100 | 39–25 | 60.9% | |
| 437 | ↓7 | 1974 | → | 130 | 129–50 | 72.1% | |
| 437 | ↑462 | 1974 | ↑105 | 71 | 53–27 | 66.3% | |
| 440 | ↓7 | 1972 | → | 147 | 11–4 | 73.3% | |
| 441 | ↓6 | 1971 | → | 99 | 333–149 | 69.1% | |
| 441 | ↓31 | 1971 | ↓10 | 80 | 104–54 | 65.8% | |
| 441 | ↑248 | 1971 | ↑61 | 79 | 222–149 | 59.8% | |
| 441 | ↑92 | 1971 | ↑24 | 68 | 86–43 | 66.7% | |
| 441 | ↓6 | 1971 | → | 96 | 19–7 | 73.1% | |
| 446 | ↓50 | 1970 | ↓16 | 95 | 59–32 | 64.8% | |
| 446 | ↓7 | 1970 | → | 130 | 47–20 | 70.1% | |
| 448 | ↑352 | 1969 | ↑83 | 81 | 100–41 | 70.9% | |
| 448 | NEW | 1969 | NEW | 112 | 15–4 | 78.9% | |
| 450 | ↓5 | 1968 | → | 119 | 144–64 | 69.2% | |
| 450 | ↓5 | 1968 | → | 75 | 118–69 | 63.1% | |
| 450 | ↓5 | 1968 | → | 113 | 129–57 | 69.4% | |
| 450 | ↓5 | 1968 | → | 106 | 45–22 | 67.2% | |
| 450 | ↓58 | 1968 | ↓19 | 68 | 359–215 | 62.5% | |
| 450 | ↓5 | 1968 | → | 88 | 114–73 | 61.0% | |
| 450 | ↑39 | 1968 | ↑11 | 68 | 140–56 | 71.4% | |
| 457 | ↓7 | 1966 | → | 116 | 57–32 | 64.0% | |
| 457 | ↓7 | 1966 | → | 103 | 64–49 | 56.6% | |
| 457 | ↓7 | 1966 | → | 122 | 184–82 | 69.2% | |
| 457 | ↓7 | 1966 | → | 81 | 114–71 | 61.6% | |
| 461 | ↓69 | 1965 | ↓22 | 67 | 616–304 | 67.0% | |
| 461 | ↓2 | 1965 | → | 143 | 147–42 | 77.8% | |
| 463 | ↓142 | 1964 | ↓50 | 78 | 240–141 | 63.0% | |
| 463 | ↑21 | 1964 | ↑6 | 65 | 241–152 | 61.3% | |
| 463 | ↓2 | 1964 | → | 130 | 105–53 | 66.5% | |
| 466 | ↓3 | 1963 | → | 120 | 115–51 | 69.3% | |
| 466 | ↓3 | 1963 | → | 124 | 20–8 | 71.4% | |
| 468 | ↓2 | 1962 | → | 96 | 75–55 | 57.7% | |
| 468 | ↓2 | 1962 | → | 88 | 81–51 | 61.4% | |
| 468 | ↓2 | 1962 | → | 69 | 149–77 | 65.9% | |
| 468 | ↓2 | 1962 | → | 122 | 30–12 | 71.4% | |
| 472 | ↓22 | 1961 | ↓5 | 85 | 113–53 | 68.1% | |
| 472 | ↓75 | 1961 | ↓24 | 82 | 155–69 | 69.2% | |
| 472 | ↑263 | 1961 | ↑60 | 95 | 58–34 | 63.0% | |
| 472 | ↑2 | 1961 | → | 125 | 150–83 | 64.4% | |
| 472 | ↑2 | 1961 | → | 66 | 156–88 | 63.9% | |
| 472 | ↑2 | 1961 | → | 108 | 242–101 | 70.6% | |
| 472 | ↑2 | 1961 | → | 122 | 99–43 | 69.7% | |
| 472 | ↓88 | 1961 | ↓30 | 83 | 54–26 | 67.5% | |
| 472 | ↓6 | 1961 | ↓1 | 52 | 259–140 | 64.9% | |
| 472 | NEW | 1961 | NEW | 116 | 12–5 | 70.6% | |
| 482 | ↑8 | 1960 | ↑4 | 74 | 519–272 | 65.6% | |
| 482 | ↓119 | 1960 | ↓39 | 100 | 174–69 | 71.6% | |
| 484 | ↓4 | 1959 | → | 89 | 152–78 | 66.1% | |
| 484 | ↓4 | 1959 | → | 121 | 427–201 | 68.0% | |
| 484 | ↓4 | 1959 | → | 90 | 69–40 | 63.3% | |
| 484 | ↓4 | 1959 | → | 78 | 213–149 | 58.8% | |
| 484 | ↑20 | 1959 | ↑6 | 80 | 66–25 | 72.5% | |
| 489 | ↑228 | 1958 | ↑53 | 68 | 927–543 | 63.1% | |
| 489 | ↓5 | 1958 | → | 136 | 127–43 | 74.7% | |
| 489 | ↓123 | 1958 | ↓40 | 56 | 748–435 | 63.2% | |
| 489 | ↓119 | 1958 | ↓37 | 77 | 135–69 | 66.2% | |
| 489 | ↓5 | 1958 | → | 99 | 192–123 | 61.0% | |
| 489 | ↑44 | 1958 | ↑11 | 110 | 25–14 | 64.1% | |
| 489 | ↓5 | 1958 | → | 133 | 11–5 | 68.8% | |
| 496 | ↑320 | 1956 | ↑73 | 79 | 130–77 | 62.8% | |
| 496 | ↑3 | 1956 | ↑2 | 96 | 54–23 | 70.1% | |
| 496 | ↓6 | 1956 | → | 120 | 37–16 | 69.8% | |
| 496 | ↓18 | 1956 | ↓4 | 67 | 187–90 | 67.5% | |
| 500 | ↓5 | 1955 | → | 144 | 81–36 | 69.2% |
How are ratings calculated? About ratings